I like this - it will allow me to blog about it as well.
2011 House of Delegates Update
It is the practice of the Election Committee to not disclose nominee/candidate intentions prior to the close of the initial nomination period on April 30th.
However, as reported in the Board minutes of March 2, 2011, Jeff Moxie will not run for reelection as USMS President. Because of Jeff's decision, it may be assumed that other qualified members, one or more who may currently be other officers, will choose to run for president. In the event current officers run for president instead of running for reelection, there will be other open positions that may not be equally apparent to all interested individuals.
Therefore, in order to maintain a fair and transparent election process the Board approved (in their meeting on April 6th , 2011) a temporary adjustment to election policy (IV.B.5) to read: "The committee may extend the nomination period six weeks for any office which the current officer is not standing for reelection after the nomination period expires."
What this means is that soon after the initial nomination period closes, on April 30, the Election Committee will post the list of candidates on the web site and reporting all positions which have an extended nomination period. This list of positions will include any office in which the current officer is not running for reelection, regardless if other candidates are slated.In addition, the Election Committee will communicate with the House of Delegates, informing you of the positions which have an extended nomination period.
As always, we encourage you, our volunteer leadership, to consider running for higher office. And if you have any interest in running or any questions about the this adjustment or any aspect of our election process, please contact any member of our election committee.
Thank you.
Rob Copeland
USMS Election Committee Chair
3 comments:
Do you have any idea how early election information has been posted in past years?
Your comments make it look like you are trying to find an excuse to find fault with the way USMS has handled elections in the past.
I suggest you get some facts before going too far down this path.
I got my facts straight and I posted the letter as is and commented on it.
to wit: "...it may be assumed that other qualified members, one or more who may currently be other officers, will choose to run for president. In the event current officers run for president instead of running for reelection, there will be other open positions that may not be equally apparent to all interested individuals. .."
The last sentence is the key phrase.
So deal with it, anonymous.
They still need to get A LOT more transparent...
What has always been in the past does not mean it is right.
Post a Comment