I am convinced that swimming is both an art and a science and what is ironic is that I have a; er..., "sketchy" stroke and I am about to give an opinion regarding freestyle.
Over at Timed Finals there is an article on Freestyle by Terry Laughlin discussing how to swim with your core. Snippet:
- Consider this… as the core is rotating so that the right shoulder is rising, it is pulling the upper arm along with it. The upper arm is pulling the forearm and hand through the catch. It is NOT the hand that initiates the pull or the propulsion, it is the CORE. If that is the case, should not the kick be timed to assist the core rather than the hand? When the timing is right, not only does the core drive the extensions called arms… it drives the extensions called legs. ALL of the body becomes involved in the stroke if it comes from the core. [Link]
Also noted is that women have proportionately longer legs than men but proportionately shorter arms. That females also have less elongated torsos
With all that in mind, if you compare Janet Evans', Laure Manaudou's, or Kate Ziegler's, stroke to that of Grant Hackett or Ian Thorpe you will notice that there is no Glide phase in these women's strokes but rather constant motion. You will see that they swim with a windmill or kayak stroke whereas Grant or Ian use their longer arms and perhaps core strength to glide.
Subsequently I am convinced that each body type swims in a different way and that no "official technique" can be imposed but rather modified to that person's needs and abilities.
Jazz is a perfect example. Dexter Gordon, Stan Getz and John Coltrane all played the tenor sax. All played with perfect pitch but all have a different sound.
3 comments:
"... one of my art anatomy books; (Art Anatomy by William Rimmer 1877) ...
Also noted is that women have proportionately longer legs than men but proportionately shorter arms. That females also have less elongated torsos because they have one less rib. (That floating rib that men have truly frames their core strength.)"
Whuhuh? Women have one less rib than men? Gosh. And to think I thought that by 1877 the world recognized that Adam's gift had conclusively set it to be the other way around.
Proportionately shorter arms?
This is a joke right?
I will post a scan.
Oops! Thank you anonymous. I edited the post in red regarding the ribs. Turns out no thievery whatsoever took place upon "Adam's body".
However I stand by the "arms" statement.
Here is a non medical reference to the shorter arm bias from Team Estrogen and active.com: www.teamestrogen.com/wsdBikes.asp
From Active.com:
"... When 64-inch male and female data is compared for arm length, women's arms are, on average, shorter by two inches. Comparing hand data of the 64-inch athletes, women tend to have hands about 0.58 inches shorter than men of the same height. This translates to concerns with reach to the hoods or drops and reach to the brake levers. ..." www.active.com/story.cfm?story_id=13161
:-P
Kidding. But thank you for putting my extraordinary claim on the hot seat - I was mis-taught about female anatomy and now I know better. So, when facts change, I change.
Post a Comment