Clay Evans; (
SCAQ founder and Olympian), was quoted in the
Wall Street Journal regarding his antipathy towards tech suits!
From WSJ.com:
Competition was fierce at a July swimming meet in Thousand Oaks, Calif. At the starting buzzer, Clay Evans, 56 years old, dived into the pool, dressed in a get-up like the one he wore in the 1976 Olympics: a flimsy nylon Speedo bikini.
[He didn't wear goggles either - tony]
It took less than 2½ minutes for the Los Angeles athlete to fall hopelessly behind the times.
Michael Mann of Centennial, Colo., flew past his opponents, swaddled shoulder-to-ankle in a black neoprene bodysuit. Mr. Mann, 55, won the 400-meter individual medley race and set a world record for his age group, 55 to 59. Mr. Mann set new world marks in the 200-, 400- and 800-meter freestyle while Mr. Evans steamed. ..."
[Link]
I was there, I swam with him and just to explain he's suit position further... he's wrong! ;-)
UPDATE: I am going to add some thoughts and criticisms here. Being
The Wall Street Journal, I am very surprised that the business end of tech suits was not discussed. There was a lot of money connected to tech suits and I would like to have read about the the business aftermath.
Another glaring point is that there was no rebuttal argument as to why suits should stay. When I was interviewed, the author was having problems finding swimmers who were passionately negative or positive about tech suits for most swimmers were sanguine; so I gave the writer Clay's phone number.
Another issue: As a
USMS swimmer, I want to vote those people out that in my estimation did not have my best interests or the sport's best interests in mind when they suggested tech suits in masters swimming should conform to the FINA international standard.
Now, with that said, I don't want to get on an airplane and fly somewhere to go vote either. I think the
USMS voting policy should be a membership vote by way of a mail-in ballot not a delegate vote.
Multi-billion dollar companies allow tiny shareholders who may only control 10-shares of stock or less out of tens-of-millions of shares to vote on serious issues like mergers, acquisitions, and board members, The
USMS should do the same. A "blow card" could easily be inserted into the
USMS magazine and the average
USMS member could put on a stamp to mail it back.
If that is too complicated, There is always
Internet voting through
Club Assistant.
UPDATE II: Q-Swim sent me this in regards to "cheating" as defined in the article:
It would be useful if the writers on the subject, and the opinionated commentary, would keep in mind the definition of "cheating":
Cheating is an act of
lying,
deception,
fraud,
trickery, imposture, or imposition. Cheating characteristically is employed to create an unfair advantage, usually in one's own interest, and often at the expense of others,
[1] Cheating implies the breaking of
rules.
1) There is no trickery,
2) There is no deception, i.e., the suits are visually observable,
3) The rules - currently - allow the use of the suits
4) Even Tiger uses a wood that is more metal than wood with a head twice the size of the woods
Ben Hogan used; is he cheating?